Quote:
Originally Posted by Horizon  There is probably some truth in that. I'm sure they will continue to try to improve it and assuming they do, a "better" ball might be available in the future. There is certainly no law that says they can't try to improve upon what they have and they would be foolish not to do so.
Will improvements be major? Probably not. |
That may be, but the way I read their comments on Facebook, they make it sound like the "new" paint is almost ready.
Here's what I'm talking about
:
Quote:
Quote:
Tom Kelley:
Roger, you are aware that part of that data shows .50 outperforming .68... Which is why they are pretty much useless until someone tells us the final weight and size of the paint...
October 13 at 4:39pm
| Quote:
GI MilSim Paintball:
The paint is not finished yet.. Once the actual weight is accomplished, then we shall see. Also, another thing is that the 50 cal has a much thinner shell. It breaks on impact much more easily at distance then the 68.
October 13 at 4:46pm
| |
And this:
Quote:
GI MilSim Paintball:
There are 5 different brands in the GI Milsim line, 4-Star (which will be the top pro tourney level ball), 3-Star, 2-Star, 1-Star and a Winter Formula.
Depending on the brand, the weights will be different.
They are made to provide players with the same flight attributes of .68 Caliber. They are tested at 300 fps and less, just like .68 Caliber.
October 12 at 6:49pm
|