Originally Posted by ThickChestHair
Again though, I don't think that is the problem. I can see wanting more definition in what you want FD to be, but the problem CJ appears to be expressing is what to do with the people who you play with who aren't part of FD, not the members. He is talking about playing more private games as opposed to mixing with the walk-ons so you can avoid the jerks.
Yes. More private games with FD only members...However we first have to decide who is FD and who will be FD so that we can make sure those private games fit the style of play we are aiming for...
If the door to FD is open too wide then the private games become diluted and loose the dynamic and atmosphere that created FD in the first place.