It was a combination of your being slightly too vague and my not DEFINITELY having enough experience with cocker terminology to get what you were saying, clearush. Trust me, I'm not 'to slow'. If you had started with this:
Quote:
|
detents in closed bolt markers prevent double feeding they do not prevent roll outs! the only thing in a closed bolt marker that will prevent roll outs are palmer wedgits and a barrel matched to the paint
|
we wouldn't have disagreed on anything except when you said this:
Quote:
|
And unless you have a gouge in the barrel that is busting paint a shotgun swab with some brasso chucked into a power drill can make that bore look shiney and pretty for a cost of $8-$10 total cost with brasso left over to do it again. Flexhone could be a good thing but it may not be nessecary.
|
I apologize for misconstruing both cocker construction and your original post. So please forgive an old man and replace the word detent where I've used it inappropriately with the word 'wedgits' and then everything I said, I'll stand by.
Including the fact that the reason that I refer to what you guys have done as trolling is, until Clearush's excellent and clear last post, NOONE has given even the slightest indication of recanting their original positions. You said flexhones take too much off so you get rollouts, I offered proof that they don't and instead of arguing that clear point we got into this big snarl, so I'll restate my case.
You can't take off less than a superfine flexhone while accomplishing the task. Even if you did manage to do so, what you accomplished would not be as smooth or work as well.
infamoussmiley,
sorry without putting the little name and comma, I was left to guess who you were talking to.
Rob