Strange on/off

hockeytown · 05-06-2008, 05:07 PM

This has been bugging me, why are these two on offs different? This is my brother's valve, the one with the fitting broken off in it.
Can this just be an earlier version? The mystery on/off is in a valve in the 15 thousands, and mine, with the familiar on/off, is in the 19 thousands.

The one on the right is the valve in question.

There is a little metal disc just resting on these o-rings

This pictures shows the way the on/offs sit in the valve. The one on the right is the on I am unfamiliar with.

K_Obeastly · 05-06-2008, 05:49 PM

reactor on/off

fairly common around here and works fairly well.

hockeytown · 05-06-2008, 06:08 PM

Is the metal disk needed? The pin is not long enough to hold it in place, and it always falls out when I remove the valve. The top set of o-rings holds everything in, so would it work without the pesky metal disk?

Ir0nExpress · 05-06-2008, 08:26 PM

Im pretty sure it needs all of it, the metal disk is held in place when it's gassed, I eventually just switched back to the stock on/off since field stripping is a lot less fun with the reactor.

hockeytown · 05-06-2008, 09:02 PM

Are there any advantages over a stock on/off?

Thanks for the help.

Robertsr · 05-06-2008, 09:09 PM

supposedly the reactor allowed more volume through the on/off. I never noticed any difference, and took mine out and sold it.

Too much of a pain in the butt when field stripping...

aqua_scummm · 05-07-2008, 01:43 AM

Some magazine did a report on them, rapid fire sections did see slightly less dropoff in a classic valve mag with the reactor

But we're talking like 3fps higher average at 12bps firing

05-06-2008, 05:07 PM	#1 (permalink)
hockeytown Never Forget Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Michigan Posts: 820	Strange on/off This has been bugging me, why are these two on offs different? This is my brother's valve, the one with the fitting broken off in it. Can this just be an earlier version? The mystery on/off is in a valve in the 15 thousands, and mine, with the familiar on/off, is in the 19 thousands. The one on the right is the valve in question. There is a little metal disc just resting on these o-rings This pictures shows the way the on/offs sit in the valve. The one on the right is the on I am unfamiliar with. __________________ http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/f...-feedback.html

05-06-2008, 05:49 PM	#2 (permalink)
K_Obeastly Seasoned Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 590	reactor on/off fairly common around here and works fairly well. __________________ I b da fat one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oERRPtEf8EM Glen Benton: doing more to convert me to christianity by 6 A.M. than most christians do all day.

05-06-2008, 06:08 PM	#3 (permalink)
hockeytown Never Forget Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Michigan Posts: 820	Is the metal disk needed? The pin is not long enough to hold it in place, and it always falls out when I remove the valve. The top set of o-rings holds everything in, so would it work without the pesky metal disk? __________________ http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/f...-feedback.html

05-06-2008, 08:26 PM	#4 (permalink)
Ir0nExpress MCB Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Staten Island/Stony Brook New York Posts: 1,223	Im pretty sure it needs all of it, the metal disk is held in place when it's gassed, I eventually just switched back to the stock on/off since field stripping is a lot less fun with the reactor. __________________ President of the SUNY Stony Brook paintball club. Feedback

05-06-2008, 09:02 PM	#5 (permalink)
hockeytown Never Forget Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Michigan Posts: 820	Are there any advantages over a stock on/off? Thanks for the help. __________________ http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/f...-feedback.html

05-06-2008, 09:09 PM	#6 (permalink)
Robertsr Ultimate Battle Monkey Z Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Waynesboro, VA Posts: 2,969	supposedly the reactor allowed more volume through the on/off. I never noticed any difference, and took mine out and sold it. Too much of a pain in the butt when field stripping... __________________ Geriatrically Assured Destruction

05-07-2008, 01:43 AM	#7 (permalink)
aqua_scummm MCB Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 1,414	Some magazine did a report on them, rapid fire sections did see slightly less dropoff in a classic valve mag with the reactor But we're talking like 3fps higher average at 12bps firing __________________ My choice is what I chose to do, and if I'm causin' no harm, it shouldn't bother you. Your choice is who you chose to be, and if you're causin' no harm, then you're alright with me.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search