![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
| Ask The Experts You ask the tough questions |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Seasoned Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Next to the salt
Posts: 523
| Sp1 v an Autococker Sp1 v an Autococker I had an Autocoker, I could strip it down and time it with no problem- I just never got into low pressure systems with it. the SP1 can fire a huge amount of paint off of one 20oz co2 (because its LP). I don't want to buy an SP marker. Can I do the same thing with an Autococker? Edit: The reason being I need a marker setup that will "sip" the gas. My Micromag Rt at D-Day this year was a HPA junkie- I could watch the gauge move on my tank every time I pulled the trigger. Last edited by Pepper; 06-30-2008 at 06:02 PM. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| MCB Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 903
| low pressure doesn't mean more efficient, in fact it's possible that extreme low pressure may make a gun MORE of a gas hog. you can certainly sweet spot a cocker and get pretty decent efficiency - but most modern electros will certainly be more efficient than a mechanical gun. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| MCB Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 903
| it's all about sweet-spotting the reg and getting the LPR set as low as possible. Cocker Tech also, based on my recent barrel tests I would suggest for maximum efficiency under-bore the paint as much as you can w/o causing barrel breaks - this may vary depending on paint shell toughness - but I saw significant improvement in efficiency with tighter paint to barrel matching. |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|