mcarterbrown.com
 

Custom Projects / Custom Questions How do I customize? What do I customize? What do I use? Share you experiences and faults here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-24-2012, 06:10 PM   #1371 (permalink)
Custom User Title
 
Wizbaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Alberta

My project phantom keeps moving along, after a lot of messing around I've got it running at 450psi, open TPC, blue main spring, and no valve spring. After a bit I decided to make a more streamlined cup. I was worried that the angled surface would reduce closing force, but it closes and holds air well.



I still don't have a chrono, but it feels like its shooting a decent FPS, around 250fps or so. What's really killing it right now is my bad paint to bore match, barrel is .686", my paint is .680 on the seam and all th way down to .655 around the rest of the ball. I'm thinking about picking up a small bore barrel, likely a 12" PPS brass in .680.
Wizbaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2012, 06:57 PM   #1372 (permalink)
Post Whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2009

Would you like to borrow my chrono? I have a shooting
__________________
If you want to talk email me.
Wagz86@gmail.com
PS3 network: Keebler1337
Aka "wagz" on the field
http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/f...-feedback.html
Keebler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 06:28 PM   #1373 (permalink)
MCB Member
 
SilentNuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In the maintenance lab

CCM Fan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizbaa;2572017[url
http://www.mcarterbrown.com/gallery/data/500/medium/IMG_12751.JPG[/url]
Very well done. If you need some field tests done on this design I'd be happy to send you more of my money. The Oversized powertube with the open TPC works wonders. Does exactly what I wanted it to. The OSPT Allows me to lower overall pressure, while maintaing a good FPS.
__________________
MCB Feedback
SilentNuke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 11:23 PM   #1374 (permalink)
YS-OFG
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas

Quote:
Originally Posted by P0E View Post
You guys might be over thinking the max efficiency numbers. Classical physics should be adequate considering all work in should come out. Conservation of energy and all that stuff. If you want to consider the thermodynamic process then you can look at both isothermal and adiabatic by just adjusting your assumptions.

Lets start with the the PV of free air and consider the compression process first. If compression was completely an adiabatic process (because PV remains perfectly insulated) all work performed on PV simply increases heat content of the gas itself. This additional heat increases the temperature/pressure. PV after compression is therefore much higher than PV before. Note this means the pressure of a 20,400ci volume of free air compressed to 68ci would be much greater than 4500psi.

Isothermal assumes the tank is not perfectly insulated so all of this heat energy flows into the atmosphere. As the tank sits there losing heat it is going from an adiabatic process to an isothermal one. PV before compression equals PV after compression once all heat exits the tank and it reaches ambient temperature. In the above example, pressure at this point WOULD now equal 4500psi.

Both isothermal and adiabatic processes come up with the same amount of potential maximum energy when used correctly. The difference is in the location of this stored energy. Isothermal stores it in the atmosphere and adiabatic stores it in the tank. Regardless, think of the gas as an energy converter instead of an energy storage device.

You can tell to what degree the compression process was isothermal or adiabatic based on how hot your tank is. We know how much work we did and the degree to which that energy would increase the gas temperature. Since most players consider a 'full' tank one that has reached the maximum fill pressure at ambient temperature, I'll say compression should be thought of as entirely isothermal and therefore all the energy is actually stored external to the tank in the form of heat in the atmosphere.

Regardless of the process, isothermal or adiabatic process, all work done to the system was converted and stored as heat about to be recovered. The compression is perfectly reversible since we live in a perfect world while calculating theoretical limits. So all we need to do is use some classical physics to determine how much work done to, or could be done by, a cylinder piston using force and distance. Once again, this is the boiled down formula:

E = P1*V*ln(P1/P2)

Now lets look at when the gas is put to work.

The adiabatic equations should work when calculating the energy inside of a tank about to undergo an adiabatic process, assuming you use the appropriately large temperatures and pressures. Remember after the tank was compressed, all heat stayed inside the tank.

So what if we assumed compression was isothermal and expansion is adiabatic? Well then energy in the tank would be the same before compression as after, just like the isothermal process. We're just ignoring the fact that the atmosphere has energy which our gas can convert to work because we are now assuming our tank is perfectly insulated so no heat will flow in.

Although the isothermal expansion process implies gas is released slow enough that heat flows into the tank at the same rate work work is performed... I'll bet we can tell to what degree that's accurate. i.e. What ratio the system is isothermal versus adiabatic. How many more shots do you get when you fire your gun once per day? If the increase is negligible, your fire rate was already mostly isothermal.

I realize this post has already turned into a novel, but let me continue onto the CO2.

I started with the mass of CO2 then calculated it's volume at ambient temp and pressure. I then calculated the amount of work performed to compress it just prior to the phase change. The phase change would be additional potential energy in the form of P deltaV which could be added as minor increase.

Now that should be a sufficient explanation as to why the following numbers are valid:

Energy in a 68ci 4500psi HPA tank: ~198KJ
Roughly 16k shots max depending on ball mass and velocity.

Energy in a 12g CO2 cartridge: ~2500J
Roughly 200 shots max depending on ball mass and velocity.


Note that if you want to take it a step past the tank, inside the gun.... i.e. argue that because the gas is released in 5mS it MUST be adiabatic because no heat can be transferred to the CO2 that quickly.... well then you'll have to provide some evidence to that argument.
Funny, I did this math and got about 2800 for a 68/45k, and 65 for a 12g. 300fps, 3.2g paintball? Drag? Linear acceleration, viscous drag... ? There's a reason nobody's gone past 3k with a 68/45k- and if theoretical was 16,000 shots per tank, I'm sure I could do at least 10,000. I already built the gun. And didn't get 1000 shots on my 13/3k.
__________________
Quote:
700 shipped Possibly pending member applying for loan
Only on MCB...

http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/f...-feedback.html
flyweightnate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 11:05 AM   #1375 (permalink)
P0E
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: P0E

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyweightnate View Post
Funny, I did this math and got about 2800 for a 68/45k, and 65 for a 12g. 300fps, 3.2g paintball? Drag? Linear acceleration, viscous drag... ? There's a reason nobody's gone past 3k with a 68/45k- and if theoretical was 16,000 shots per tank, I'm sure I could do at least 10,000. I already built the gun. And didn't get 1000 shots on my 13/3k.
Not sure I understand all of what you wrote, but it appears you too incorrectly applied the PV=E formula.

Simply calculate remaining energy after some expansion to discover the energy of your system remains constant. No matter how much work was invested or removed through compression or expansion, the system's energy remains constant. Free energy is a myth.

The reason no one has exceeded 3k with a 68/45 is the same reason most people thought PV=E applied in this situation.

I suggest reading all of my previous posts. There's a simple little experiment in there that shows how the correct formula can be derived.
P0E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 06:54 PM   #1376 (permalink)
starts off small at first
 
splattttttt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bean Town, U.S.A.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizbaa View Post
My project phantom keeps moving along, after a lot of messing around I've got it running at 450psi, open TPC, blue main spring, and no valve spring. After a bit I decided to make a more streamlined cup. I was worried that the angled surface would reduce closing force, but it closes and holds air well.



I still don't have a chrono, but it feels like its shooting a decent FPS, around 250fps or so. What's really killing it right now is my bad paint to bore match, barrel is .686", my paint is .680 on the seam and all th way down to .655 around the rest of the ball. I'm thinking about picking up a small bore barrel, likely a 12" PPS brass in .680.
more of this and less hype please ( ;
__________________
"Democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others which have been tried." Winston Churchill

THE-SHOOTIST Anyone chubbin' like me for this?
mailmanmike Since Monday! That's more than 4 hours though, so according to those cialis ads I should see my doctor.
tlane77 I think for a non-chemical chubby it's 6 hours before its time to see a doctor. So you should be good for another couple hours.
splattttttt I wasn't goin to google "chubbin" because I assumed it had to do with fat. The lard type, not the fun stuff. But what ever feelings Jeff's experiencing, then they must be of the fun like stuff...
tlane77 He's got a woody for your woods.
splattttttt land
splattttttt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 09:48 AM   #1377 (permalink)
P0E
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: P0E

Quote:
Originally Posted by splattttttt View Post
more of this and less hype please ( ;
Very little hype in this thread. Did you mean more experimentation and less theory? Ya, theory time is over. I look forward to any experimentation.
P0E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2013, 11:21 PM   #1378 (permalink)
is my hero
 
Manning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: St. Louis area

Palmers Fan
Took me a week but I've finished all 140 pages. I'll add my VKC Duck to the testing pool as it takes stock CCI parts. I'll also offer to fund research if needed.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigOldSkool View Post
Mcb.... if it isn't modded, whored, lusted over or covered in mayo.... then that gun does not exist.
Feedback thread: http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/f...-feedback.html
Manning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 01:11 AM   #1379 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2007

Has there been any recent testing of the new valves?

The slam valve regulated?

Or any of the others?

Could we get a quick rehasing of the major issues with the stock valve train? i saw something regarding closing force(or lack there of) but that was about it...

My eyes started to bleed and i had to skip around some...

Maybe add an eddit on the first page with links to the highlights? (Mod might have to do this because of thread age?)

Im planning on spending a weekend or two in the shop making parts for my project guns. would like to add the phantom to that list!

-Levi
saber63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 06:05 AM   #1380 (permalink)
starts off small at first
 
splattttttt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bean Town, U.S.A.

Quote:
Originally Posted by P0E View Post
Very little hype in this thread. Did you mean more experimentation and less theory? Ya, theory time is over. I look forward to any experimentation.
Thank you

Theory is great, but without results, we don't really have a leg to stand on.
__________________
"Democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others which have been tried." Winston Churchill

THE-SHOOTIST Anyone chubbin' like me for this?
mailmanmike Since Monday! That's more than 4 hours though, so according to those cialis ads I should see my doctor.
tlane77 I think for a non-chemical chubby it's 6 hours before its time to see a doctor. So you should be good for another couple hours.
splattttttt I wasn't goin to google "chubbin" because I assumed it had to do with fat. The lard type, not the fun stuff. But what ever feelings Jeff's experiencing, then they must be of the fun like stuff...
tlane77 He's got a woody for your woods.
splattttttt land
splattttttt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  mcarterbrown.com » Custom » Custom Projects / Custom Questions

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO
© MCB Network LLC