![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
| Dangerous Power Fusion |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Rec Poster Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 84
| What's with F8 efficiency? I have been doing multiple searches trying to find out the REAL average efficiency of the F8. I have read claims that the gun supposedly gets 1500 to 1700 shots off a 68/4500 but then when I read reviews, others are saying 1100 to 1300. I have come across this multiple times. Is there a legit reason for this giant gap? I haven't read anything like this when people review the G3. All the efficiency claims for the G3 are pretty consistent. Am I wrong to assume the FASOR system is more efficient than a spool valve? |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Newbie | Last time I paid any attention to My F8 I easily got 1800 shots off my 68 4500. From the limited reading I've done, it seems the FASOR systems are more effcient then a spool. Next time out I'll have to REALLY pay attention to it and not just keep refilling everytime I walk off the field. I love my F8. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Rec Poster Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 84
| Small Block, how broke-in is your gun? The review from Splat Magazine (available online) said the gun straight out of the box got 1530 shots off a 68/4500. Other owners say similar numbers. Xluben posted on PBN that the Fusion is supposed to get 1600-1800+ off a 68/4500. I can understand a 100 round difference but not 200+. Is the FASOR design one that becomes more efficient as it breaks in? |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Newbie | It's pretty well broken in. I've put probably 6 cases through it. But thinking about it now I've got the Alamo City PB del-flo bolt in it too. Not sure how much that's affecting the efficiency. The one day at practice I shot over a case out of it all on my one 68 4500, but my battery was dying and I wasn't getting full velocity out of the marker part of the time. That day I didn't count as a real good test. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Newbie Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1
| After shooting about too many dry tanks, and throwing a CP reg on it, I'm getting around a hopper and 10-11 pods depending on the paint i'm shooting, but with DxS Field, i'm tuned at 280-285 fps. somewhere in the 1680-1750 range usually
__________________ Dangerous Power F8 Classic mag-gold. soon to be seeing custom work Sn!per 2 hacked up piranha, soon to be a pump-almost done... Exile PB. my team, and a great company. Will make their debut into the pb world soon. Last edited by randompaintspray3454; 06-26-2008 at 10:35 AM. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Active Member Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 169
| Just the way in which people measure/calculate efficiency can easily account for a 200 ball difference, or more. Keeping track of all the paint you shoot for 3 or more games and accounting for spilled pods, hot fills, dry firing, etc, etc makes it pretty tough. And most people that do a sit-down test will not shoot through a cold, 4500 psi fill. I know I usually do a 500rd bag and extrapolate from there. It is probably accurate within a pod or so if you do a decent job at reading the gauge. |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|