Boondock 2 - Page 3

netsurferdude2 · 03-13-2010, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shane-O

Sean Patrick Flannery didnt even look like himself, plastic surgery maybe. I wasnt sure it was him until 75% through the movie.

That was one thing I really noticed. The entire movie I am telling myself that it is a different person but I looked it up on IMDB and it turned out to be him.

I thought the film was a complete let down and really wasnt worth the bandwidth I used to DL it.

DFSniper · 03-13-2010, 11:14 AM

hey, in 10 years, you dont expect them to age?

he's not there yet...

i agree with battle, the whole rope scene was too forced, and the dialogue was so rushed i didnt catch it til the second time...

Shane-O · 03-13-2010, 12:11 PM

Age yes, but to dang near change your entire face in 10 years time is weird. In my opinion, plastic surgery is the culprit

If you watch the movie you can clearly see that it follows the original script with minor changes. The Rope, the scene with them acting like they are gonna shoot the new sidekick, the FBI inspector removing headphones (non existant ones at that), the killing of a friend (Greenlee) etc. Troy Duffy ran out of steam on the first one it seems. While some will say the first one was a bad movie, it was entertaining and the acting was not bad. Sure it wasnt great, but for the movie that it is, the acting fits.

scottthetot · 03-13-2010, 12:45 PM

i liked it alot

DFSniper · 03-13-2010, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shane-O

If you watch the movie you can clearly see that it follows the original script with minor changes. The Rope, the scene with them acting like they are gonna shoot the new sidekick, the FBI inspector removing headphones (non existant ones at that), the killing of a friend (Greenlee) etc. Troy Duffy ran out of steam on the first one it seems. While some will say the first one was a bad movie, it was entertaining and the acting was not bad. Sure it wasnt great, but for the movie that it is, the acting fits.

i agree yet disagree. the sidekick part bugged me. the rope is like his signature tool, but it could have played out a bit better. Bloom was Smecker's protege, so of course she picked up on some of his habits (ear plugs instead of headphones, silence helped her concentrate).

the thing that bugged me most was when they changed the bodies around in the restaraunt. the last guy on the right to get shot takes a bullet hole from an invisible gun BEFORE the guy across from him fires, then another one in almost the same spot.

03-13-2010, 12:45 PM	#24 (permalink)
scottthetot abide Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: washington state not dc	i liked it alot __________________ My Feedback

03-13-2010, 12:11 PM	#23 (permalink)
Shane-O Needs new knees Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: St. Louis	Age yes, but to dang near change your entire face in 10 years time is weird. In my opinion, plastic surgery is the culprit If you watch the movie you can clearly see that it follows the original script with minor changes. The Rope, the scene with them acting like they are gonna shoot the new sidekick, the FBI inspector removing headphones (non existant ones at that), the killing of a friend (Greenlee) etc. Troy Duffy ran out of steam on the first one it seems. While some will say the first one was a bad movie, it was entertaining and the acting was not bad. Sure it wasnt great, but for the movie that it is, the acting fits.