General Chat MCB's Coffee House: Pull up a seat, and grab your favorite caffeinated beverage. Non-paintball related chat within.

Thread Tools
Old 10-25-2012, 06:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
Slowly making progress
desertT1's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vail, AZ

Originally Posted by HP_Lovecraft View Post
Sorry. Basically, 100 years ago, the average women had 10 children in her life. Today, the average is 2 and dropping. This is parity since it takes 2 people to produce those 2 children.

There is a TED video somewhere that explains it all:

This goes against the long held belief that population is an exponential expansion, and we are running out of room. Truth is that as the world becomes more "modern", and prosperious, people are having far fewer children, and at a much later age.

Ok, that's better. I was confused because the other measurements were per 1000 population, which is in the ~19 ballpark.

I've always thought that the 'average number of children per couple' or some form of it was the clearest measurement, which is what you used, just worded a little differently (and probably better, but I came up with the idea before I understood exactly what I was measuring, if that makes sense). 2 is the magic number. Anything less and things are going down. I just can't imagine living in a time where it was 10 kids as the norm instead of 2. I couldn't have handled that.
>>> Link to prototype Dust Devil<<<
DT1 Dust Devil want list. Click me! <<Closed for now so I can catch up
Originally Posted by Mar View Post
I really like the picture posts, because I don't understand most of the word posts.
desertT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 07:23 PM   #12 (permalink)
Deluxe super psychedelic
wrongbloke's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Denver, CO

Brass and Wood Fan
I dont like how the offhand solution in that video was just that TV networks need to give up specturm and stop broadcasting. in this age of $150 cable bills (and considering the state of the economy) I know plenty of people who are dropping cable service to save money or those like me who will never get it so as not to increase the number of bills I have to pay, not to mention those who could never afford it in the first place. access to that information is free and a public good, that's how emergency messages make it to us a lot of the time. forcing people to only have access to that if they bend over for the cable companies is most definitely the wrong solution, better compression and new technologies however are the right ones.

the cable companies are NEVER the good guys, for ****s sake, they cant even be persuaded to offer ala carte programming channels b/c of how greedy they are.

Photo blog:
If you are straight with me, I am straight with you :
Created by Shade, stolen from foughtwolf's sig
Originally Posted by splatmaster12 View Post
If I didn't play pump I wouldn't play, simple as that.
wrongbloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply » General » General Chat

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO
© MCB Network LLC