![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
| Paintball News The latest in paintball news brought to you by the oldest independent publication in paintball and the best paintball site on the web - The Paintball News and MCB |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #111 (permalink) | |
| Ask me How! Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Chino, CA | Quote:
From what Rami tells me, Scarab Arms is developing these new rounds not an outside company. You should not speculate just because they don't reply to your questions. I can ask about what their plans are regarding the weight. Remember, it's still in development. | |
| | |
| | #112 (permalink) | |
| MCB Member Join Date: Mar 2008 |
First, I would like to say that by no means am I saying anything negative about Scarab Arms or, even the individuals behind it. I'm not just making speculations due to their lack of reply, nor am I saying that Perfect Circle is doing all of the development work. Scarab Arms could say they are involved in the development just by having Perfect Circle build them different projectiles to Scarab's specs for testing and final selection (i.e. "give us the fun pattern of the FN303 but, make the whole projectile a container, and give us fragmentation grooves in the nose sectin and fill from the rear"). Here's two other reasons for my speculation which I freely admit to be the case: The similarity between the FS rounds, and Scarabs prototypes in the pics (fin height, angle, length, the interface between the nose section and the tail section- a "shoe box" joint used by perfect circle). What are the chances that these design features are not covered by patent/s? Also, how many paintball companies (especially startups) have the capital available for developing a fin stabilized round of their own from scratch (i.e. optimal twist rate, length of skirt, center of gravity/pressure, etc, etc)? This doesn't even cover the material sciences knowledge pertaining to the shell material (i.e. something that breaks on impact but, not in the gun).
__________________ 1989 Line SI Bushmaster SI Deluxe | SP 'Woodstalker' Ion | T9.1SD Totmacher First Strike Round Field Listing | External Ballistics, FSRs and PBs Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #113 (permalink) | |
| Seasoned Member | Quote:
i have to agree, one of the reasons I have not posted any of the many conversations I have had with Rami is that he really cant say, ideas cost $$$ and as we all know certian companies snap ideas up pretty readly.
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #114 (permalink) | |
| Newbie in training Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Oregon, U.S.A | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #115 (permalink) | |
| One in the Pipe! | Quote:
Fantastic thank you for the info. | |
| | |
| | #116 (permalink) |
| Serving Tea for CCM |
I am an idiot who cannot multitask.
Last edited by senghing27; 10-28-2012 at 06:12 AM. |
| | |
| | #117 (permalink) |
| giant robot Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: New Zealand |
It looks good and if they've really managed to fix most of the issues with uturn mags then that's a huge bonus. I'm just not about to buy a marker without eyes that isn't a pump. Also an electro wont fire without a ball in the chamber (and you don't need to recock it after) and allows 3shot burst etc. so it's much more "realistic" and reliable. The DAM is the closest thing but dmag style mags are a dealbreaker, and no stocktank or airthru option = yuk. More power to scarab though, this looks like a well thought out design even if it is a blowback. |
| | |
| | #118 (permalink) | |
| Spyder Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Los Angeles | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #119 (permalink) |
| Seasoned Member | I'm thinking that as well, due to the bolt on the side...
__________________ Feedback http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/f...-feedback.html An AK will not be stopped by a ham sandwich. |
| | |
| | #120 (permalink) | |
| Ask me How! Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Chino, CA |
Ummm i think you might have gotten your threads mixed up dude lol Quote:
| |
| | |