![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
| Paintball News The latest in paintball news brought to you by the oldest independent publication in paintball and the best paintball site on the web - The Paintball News and MCB |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #201 (permalink) |
| Active Member Join Date: Feb 2007 |
So 13.3 was the number some corporate think tank came up with... great. Hope it saves them loads of money. Now if they could just ban spectator coaching I might actually respect PSP as a league. Lol I haven't seen Blackballed but it sounds pretty funny. Anyone know if you can netflix it? Might try to convince the lab guy I work with to request it. The ramping vs. unlimited semi issue is quite interesting. Personally I have always thought nppl was the better of the two series, more pure in a sense. I can see the argument for the route psp has taken... it's def easier to regulate cheating with a rof cap. From my brief experiance photographing at a nppl event I gathered that the refs really test out the guns when they chrono them, but I know theres ways around being detected and all that. I'm no expert in the matter. I think ramping is lame, but again I can certainly see the problems it solves vs. unlimited semi and the open invitation/advantage for cheater boards. Maybe nppl should figure out what the max rate an above average set of fingers can humanly pull and set a cap there... what would be wrong with that? I guess it's just more complex than that
__________________ I Don't Need 15 Welts a Second |
| | |
| | #205 (permalink) | |
| Active Member Join Date: May 2007 | Quote:
no, thats not quite right. then its 13bps, 13bps followed by 14bps then dropping back down to 13. if one was to fire at 13bps continuously for 3 seconds (throwing out the .01 margin of error) capping at 13.33bps will mean 13bps or 13bps then a chop. if i was granted an extra ball every 3 seconds then shouldnt i be granted the liberty of saving it up and firing 30bps in a burst followed by a minute or so behind cover? thats gonna cause alot of problems and they need to decide 13bps or 14bps. capping it at 13.33bps is just gonna cause alot of problems and dispute over the extra .33 if i fire 13bps for 1 second, then duck behind cover for 5 seconds, followed by another capped burst of 13 (theroticly assuming i stop at exactly 13 each time) followed by another 5 seconds behind cover, am i now granted 14bps? does it reset if im not continuously firing? yes i realize that 1 extra ball on the 3rd second isnt gonna matter much in terms of gameplay, but in terms of arguements upon players exceeding the capped speed and disputes and debates about what it means, i see alot of problems with it | |
| | |
| | #206 (permalink) | |
| Post Whore Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Northwestern Pennsylvania | Quote:
__________________ A skeleton walks into a bar and orders a beer and a mop...... Feedback: http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/f...-feedback.html | |
| | |
| | #207 (permalink) | |
| Active Member | Quote:
__________________ Goblins made the San Andreas Fault They also like forks. | |
| | |
| | #208 (permalink) | |
| Active Member Join Date: May 2007 | Quote:
though i still dont see the point for the change. heck i say leave it uncapped, let the sport grow and advance to however far it possibly can | |
| | |