![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
| Paintball News The latest in paintball news brought to you by the oldest independent publication in paintball and the best paintball site on the web - The Paintball News and MCB |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Back to paintball. | PSP Officially Changes ROF PSP Officially Changes ROF | Paintball Headlines Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Passing through rider |
If you are so worried about .9bps and being cheated out of it... you got some problems. Want to make sure you arent fined? Set your gun to 11bps. There.. that was easy
__________________ Bryan "Azzy" Spiegel Riverside Renegade Paintball / C.C. S.V.S. Plankowner - LPPC#6 "It is my right to be uncommon—if I can. I seek opportunity—not security. I do not wish to be a kept citizen, humbled and dulled by having the state look after me.... ” - Dean Alfange |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Molested by MAr FCM# 623 Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Jersey |
Hi, Quote:
High ROFs do compensate somewhat for that draw but not by much. When you raise you are not bound but high mechanical weight to squeeze the trigger, just by the click of the switch's weight. Seriously though, I do not think mechanicals will be making a come back in tourney ball. Maybe on the lower levels but not on the premiere levels. It's just electros are here to stay. Some people I play with never cared for electros. In the past few years, they got electros because they realized they needed to adapt to a newer playing environment. There was a local speed ball field. These are very good players too. The one guy got an e-gun cause it was getting harder to pull the trigger anymore. Playing for the last 20 years with pumps and mags, shoulder and back injuries, did not agree with playing either. I watched the same guy years ago dive into a bunker and come up with such a painful look in his face. Later, shaggy
__________________ MCB Political Talk...Sometimes a porn sub forum is just a better idea. Founding Member and Officer of Team Predator Don't trust me? Here is my Street Creed! M.Carter Brown's Feedback | Automags.Org's Feedback | Ebay's Feedback | PayPal Verified | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| The Furry Tailed One Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Damn it's hot, Florida |
I fail to see how this will change anything.......You'll lose 2 balls so what.....(ask a married guy what it's like )And shag your signature is wrong the legislated that he gets paid 400,000 while Kerry was a senator.....So when Kerry ran for president he would of received 200,000 if he was in office.....Bush receives 400,000 though (he wasn't a part of them legislating it is why that this holds true). ![]() Like I said though....This is not going to change anything other then the fact that boards will now have settings to cap at 13.33 so meh skiddish |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| MCB Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Alabama | "The PSP rules also state that only a maximum of 3 shots per trigger pull can be fired." If they can police that, they can police 1 shot per trigger pull. But I figure it actually means that the pulls to start and keep ramping up will be raised to 4.4 pulls per second, instead of 3.x it is now. So its actually two changes. One to lower ROF, the other to raise (very slightly) the difficulty of ramping. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Post Whore Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Northwestern Pennsylvania |
Didn't we do about 20 pages on this when it was believed that it probably would be 13.33BPS? EDIT: Hey, yeah. 20 pages exactly. PSP Ramping BPS Cap being lowered? Maybe we could merge the threads to avoid the carpal tunnel (and emotional scarring) flare ups?
__________________ A skeleton walks into a bar and orders a beer and a mop...... Feedback: http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/f...-feedback.html |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Active Member Join Date: Jul 2007 |
Now I know I'm a lowly recreational player, but can anyone point me to the article where the justification or the absolute need for such a change to take affect was warranted? Or is this a bunch of panhandling to certain parties? I don't see anything mentioned about safety reasons and if it was safety related, then all it took was 2 ball in a single second to make that big of a difference?
|
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|