A look at Bob Long's M-Tac scenario marker - Page 14

skipjack289 · 07-02-2008, 11:57 PM

An AR/M16 grip would look great. If he keeps the 45 grip, it would be cool if he adds the hump in the back of the grip. But even if this is a mock up, it looks great. Hats off to BL.

russc · 07-03-2008, 12:08 AM

Too bad about that whole hopper thing, eh?

Harbinger[TG] · 07-03-2008, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by russc

Too bad about that whole hopper thing, eh?

I was just thinking that hopper doesn't look right on it.

RealtorTommy · 07-03-2008, 12:59 AM

2lwvxu8.jpg

Now that I seen many pics of it from different angles,,,,

The whole setup is akward looking. I agree that a M-4/16 front grip would balance it out better. I don't think any loader will look great on this type of milsim marker. Maybe a barrel shroud of some sort work work also.

John Satclaire · 07-03-2008, 01:23 AM

bolt on Q adaptor to replace the feedneck assembly, and a rail mount Q

711 · 07-03-2008, 02:01 AM

^Yeah, a Q Loader would look pretty slick. After playing stock class, all hoppers look disgusting to me.

browndogmike · 07-06-2008, 01:32 PM

it looks alright
i just dont like how the tank is below the stock
it makes it look really back heavy

Drizit · 07-08-2008, 06:58 PM

I like the ATS setup... hopper beside the gun below the rail... if you didn't want to use a Qloader (not everyone likes em) you could put a warp feed on.

Sir Brass · 07-08-2008, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frink

25 bps is absurd.

But oh so fun

.

I've found myself doing better in pball games when I'm playing pump (the restricted ROF makes me play more aggressive and therefore be in better positions for better shots), but still.....being able to get out there for a while and simply dump paint and laugh maniacly (sp?) while doing it is definitely fun.

But in moderation, else it loses the fun factor

.

I need to budget me one of these things (though Spiro won't allow FA or ramping at his games so it'll have to stay on semi......I see an opportunity for a new grip frame), right along with getting an AT-4 or AT-85

.

Critical · 07-08-2008, 09:49 PM

My personal opinion is that the marker itself isn't that bad, from a purely mil-sim perspective. They really need to dump all the crap on the front end. The bipod, foregrip, flashlight and laser detract from the simple clean lines of the marker. The stock doesn't look too bad, but from the angles I've seen, it could be more integrated into the butt of the marker. They also should have stayed away from the gas-through grip, sure it's cool that there's no exposed hoses, but the integrated ASA really restricts more options than it opens up.

07-02-2008, 11:57 PM	#131 (permalink)
skipjack289 MCB Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Maryland	An AR/M16 grip would look great. If he keeps the 45 grip, it would be cool if he adds the hump in the back of the grip. But even if this is a mock up, it looks great. Hats off to BL. __________________ The world is full of kings and queens, who blind your eyes and steal your dreams. It's Heaven and Hell. -Ronnie James Dio "radio edit" YOU! I WON'T DO WHAT YOU TELL ME! - Zach de la Rocha http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/f...tml#post160057 MY FEEDBACK

07-03-2008, 12:08 AM	#132 (permalink)
russc Newbie Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC	Too bad about that whole hopper thing, eh? __________________ YouTube Channel / Raincouver! / Gallery / Feedback / Blackleaf Outfitters I will be a complete and total douchebag towards any player who is trying to pull a DMW.

07-06-2008, 01:32 PM	#137 (permalink)
browndogmike Newbie Join Date: May 2008	it looks alright i just dont like how the tank is below the stock it makes it look really back heavy Last edited by browndogmike; 07-06-2008 at 01:39 PM..

07-03-2008, 01:23 AM	#135 (permalink)
John Satclaire MCB Member Join Date: Feb 2008	bolt on Q adaptor to replace the feedneck assembly, and a rail mount Q

07-03-2008, 02:01 AM	#136 (permalink)
711 MCB Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: SoCal	^Yeah, a Q Loader would look pretty slick. After playing stock class, all hoppers look disgusting to me.

07-08-2008, 06:58 PM	#138 (permalink)
Drizit Newbie Join Date: Apr 2008	I like the ATS setup... hopper beside the gun below the rail... if you didn't want to use a Qloader (not everyone likes em) you could put a warp feed on.

07-08-2008, 09:49 PM	#140 (permalink)
Critical TANSTAAFL Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: People's Republic of Maryland	My personal opinion is that the marker itself isn't that bad, from a purely mil-sim perspective. They really need to dump all the crap on the front end. The bipod, foregrip, flashlight and laser detract from the simple clean lines of the marker. The stock doesn't look too bad, but from the angles I've seen, it could be more integrated into the butt of the marker. They also should have stayed away from the gas-through grip, sure it's cool that there's no exposed hoses, but the integrated ASA really restricts more options than it opens up.