![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Rec Poster Join Date: Apr 2006 | Last I checked, the difference was $42 Sorry, it's the difference between 2 lines or porting or 4 lines. Either way they swirl around the barrel similar to another company's patented porting style, but not as far back the barrel. There is a mild reduction in noise, but it's nowhere near as dramatic as porting versus no porting. It comes down to how quiet you want it, but I'm not sure it's worth the $ difference to dual port over a single ported barrel. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Rec Poster Join Date: Feb 2007 | I think you've got it the other way around, Industrial. For single venting compared to no porting is $42, but the difference between single and double venting I believe is $18. For a Houndstooth, I would recommend either a ported or single vented barrel. IMO, there will be little difference between a single and double vented barrel. The larger difference will be between the ported and unported barrel. A little advice on porting: If your gun operates at under 450psi then porting is worth while for sound control. Anything above that and it's money better spent elsewhere.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| Supernatural Anaesthetist | Quote:
However, a LP setup with a heavily ported barrel will probably be very quiet, but probably not very efficient, at least not as efficient as it could be with a solid, unported barrel. It's all semantics, though...there are no hard and fast rules because there are just too many variables involved... | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| Rec Poster Join Date: Feb 2007 | Quote:
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Administrator Join Date: May 2006 Location: Trenchtown | Well, for me, nothing about "low pressure" gun designs has ever made logical sense. That said, I have had extensive experience with a pair of Hurricanes, one of which is ported and one of which is not. I find that the ported gun (as it happens it is dual ported) is generally more accurate than the unported gun. I have had similar experiences with Blazers. Granted, Hurcs are not low pressure, and I have not ever bothered to test efficiency but I have never noticed a significant difference in that, like I have been able to observe with the porting. That said, I hate porting. D/ |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Supernatural Anaesthetist | Is your cat making the same face you make when you have to clean all the little itty bits of paint and shell out of that porting? As for the difference in accuracy between those two Hurcs, Glenn himself would probably attribute that to minor differences in the tolerances, honing pattern of the barrels, or one of the other dozens of variables rather than the fact that one is ported and the other isn't. That's just coincidence. Saying that the ported one is quieter, I'd buy, but more accurate (because of the porting) - no sale! Last edited by Wycke; 02-21-2007 at 10:00 PM.. |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|