sigma 17-50mm IS f2.8

Arson24 · 11-14-2012, 04:22 PM

Is it worth $600 that the guy is asking?

chopper duke · 11-14-2012, 05:50 PM

Personally, I try and only buy brand lenses. They'll hold their value in the long run. And seem to be better quality.

Arson24 · 11-15-2012, 03:27 PM

good point

aaronlecain · 11-16-2012, 09:48 AM

Sigma and Tamron are the only off brand lenses I will buy. That being said. Everyone has their lowered lenses. I have a sigma 150mm Macro that is awesome.

11-14-2012, 04:22 PM	#1 (permalink)
Arson24 MCB Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Vancouver, B.C	sigma 17-50mm IS f2.8 Is it worth $600 that the guy is asking? __________________ When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro!

11-14-2012, 05:50 PM	#2 (permalink)
chopper duke www.Axial-Photography.com Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Metro ATL	Personally, I try and only buy brand lenses. They'll hold their value in the long run. And seem to be better quality. __________________ My: MCB feedback {total = 275+}

11-15-2012, 03:27 PM	#3 (permalink)
Arson24 MCB Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Vancouver, B.C	good point __________________ When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro!

11-16-2012, 09:48 AM	#4 (permalink)
aaronlecain To the Space Olympics! Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Belmont NH	Sigma and Tamron are the only off brand lenses I will buy. That being said. Everyone has their lowered lenses. I have a sigma 150mm Macro that is awesome. __________________ About as subtle as a flying brick Feedback http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/f...-feedback.html