mcarterbrown.com  

Photography Grab your camera and video equipment and head on inside!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-06-2013, 03:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
pk5
Stardust Memory
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego

CCM Fan
AKA Fan
Brass N Wood Fan
RTP Fan
Mega ZOOM question - Canon

Hi everyone

Next tuesday I am shooting at a graduation inside an area that is pretty much well lit. If anyone is in the area, it is the Cox/Viejas Arena at SDSU and it is a basketball/other stuff kind of Arena.

I want to be able to shoot the graduates walking up the stage from the stand and I am planning on shooting using a 400 F2.8. Does anyone have any experience shooting from such a length?

I am also considering the 200-400 F4 but I am afraid that there may not be enough light to use the 200-400 since I only get one shot.

The problem with the 400 is not just the prime, but also the weight (nearly 30 lbs) for that giant thing.

So back to the question: Have anyone have experience shooting in an arena, and what would you recommend?

Thanks
pk5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 05:55 PM   #2 (permalink)
Sic Itur Ad Astra
 
Falcon16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: St. Catharines Ontario Canada
Send a message via MSN to Falcon16 Send a message via Skype™ to Falcon16

CCM Fan
Brass N Wood Fan
Palmers Fan
well if you're shooting from the stands a 400mm would probably be a safe bet but yea 30lbs of lens would be a downer. A big question I would have before I would suggest either though is what camera body are you putting them on? if it's something with good low light performance than go with the 200-400 if it's something where low light is not it's real strength the 400 with it's 2.8 would be a better bet weight aside of course.
__________________

Feedback +34/-0
Click here to email me
My youtube channel
My downsizing/cleaning house sale





Quote:
Originally Posted by ApoC_101 View Post
Pump paintball is cheaper than any drug habit I've ever heard of.
Falcon16 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 07:41 PM   #3 (permalink)
Mind Your Manners
 
Mike Deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tampa Bay

The 400/2.8 is not something I would jump in with if you've never used it before. Long lens technique requires practice.
Mike Deep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 07:57 PM   #4 (permalink)
pk5
Stardust Memory
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego

CCM Fan
AKA Fan
Brass N Wood Fan
RTP Fan
I have used the 400 before. It was just a pain in the *** for someone who is only 5' 6"


I just reserved the 200-400 instead, and I am shooting from a 5d mark ii. So I will just have to use the higher Iso.

Will report back the result.
pk5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 01:42 AM   #5 (permalink)
Happy and homeless
 
sparky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Alberta Canada
Send a message via Skype™ to sparky

What about the 400 5.6 or the 100-400? Both respectable lenses... And lighter.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by heinous View Post
we're talking about camping, not being homeless
Vagabond living on the side of the road in East Asia.
sparky is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  mcarterbrown.com » General » Off-Topic » Photography

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO
© MCB Network LLC