![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
| Redux Home of the Redux |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #31 (permalink) | |
| (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻) | Quote:
Great job CJ. A+ work, and way to keep it clean
__________________ ![]() My Feedback live in the puget sound or BC and play pump. JOIN US! I highly endorse Open source Development. PPS Blazer, Splash Mag, and a Cocker for Sale! | |
| | |
| | #35 (permalink) | |
| One in the Pipe! | Quote:
Take a PPS Super Stock for example it's all technique, simple albeit but technique none the less and much different than pumping a Line SI Bushmaster. It has been stated I have a special pump technique for my Redux but if you watch the video all I do is pump it. I used no special "shake, rattle or roll!" as seen here: Heck I'm even sitting on a bunk balancing an iPhone on my leg and not one bind, pinch or jam was witnessed. So for discussion purposes only I think this whole thing was much ado about nothing. "It's a breech drop marker!" that being said is the very reason "bore" drop was invented. The best thing any SC player can do is take your time and size your paint. Throw away oblong or dimpled balls and you will greatly reduce any likelyhood of feed problems. Seriously I think it would be a cool mod if it really helps the operation of the marker but other than CJ and one or two others who are new to SC Bore drop play I really haven't heard of others having similar problems at least not enough to carve out a $1,400.00 marker with a $39.00 dremel. I would love to see a video when you have time CJ on the feedability of the mod. Last edited by Mar; 03-06-2011 at 11:54 PM. | |
| | |
| | #36 (permalink) | ||||||
| Tempus fugit. Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Canada's National Capital | Fastest Duck in the World
Shinkansen duck. ![]() Quote:
Quote:
I wonder if your Redux isn't somehow machined different from the rest of ours. I don't doubt your technique worked either; I've seen the video! If I'd made a video of exactly the same technique with R043, you would have see a lot of soup being made. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Pump technique is an option; for me, twisting back and away from the feed tube worked. There was still a risk of pinching though. Would you want to go into combat with a shotgun that you had to pump while tilted, or it would cease to function? That'd be a good way to get killed in the heat of battle. Quote:
Last edited by CJOttawa; 03-01-2011 at 07:56 PM. | ||||||
| | |
| | #37 (permalink) |
| One in the Pipe! |
Fair enough CJ! You have to forgive me I just started some "Charger" over 40 suppliments and they really get me going. It has a so called testosterone suppliment and gets you thinking at warp speed. It is after all your marker to modify as you see fit. I guess in the end I take issue with the following statement "serious design flaw" when I dont see it that way. It is what it is, as are the Carter and Loo Ducks. They all pump very different from a traditional marker. I guess if you can come up with an improvement I shouldnt hold it against you because that is "EXACTLY" what mOngo did to the Carter and Loo Duck. He saw a need for improvement and designed a better Duck. Based on his upgraded design you know hear rumors of Earon possibly making removeable barrels with inserts which was unheard of in the past. I'll look forward to the video and in the end maybe your design will lead to new high speed feeding Tactical Redux's. Last edited by Mar; 03-06-2011 at 11:52 PM. |
| | |
| | #38 (permalink) |
| MCB Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: San Diego now Pensacola |
First off Congrats CJ on your success! Second DSA, Earon is making ducks with removable barrel and inserts. He is finishing up a run of baby ducks and ducks. The major design change was the angle of the feed tube, and the thickness of the snub and body at the junction. Last edited by Mar; 03-06-2011 at 11:53 PM. |
| | |
| | #39 (permalink) | |
| One in the Pipe! | Quote:
The evolution of the Duck has begun based on supply and demand. Prior to the Redux, the very thought of a continuing evolution was non-existent! From what I have read on MCB since the beginning, the Duck was what it was and customization was not an option. That's not to say Earon has not created lasting works of art while he single handedly carried the DD68 torch for yarn. But I am of the opinion other than aesthetics he did nothing to evolve the usability of the DD68, unlike what mOngo has been able to accomplish in a very short time with regards to marker evolution. Nothing will ever compare to the original DD68 Desert Duck, nor will any thing ever come close to a Carter DD68, that being said nothing on the Stock Class DD68 planet compares to the usability and raw beauty of the Redux Factory flag ship marker, the DD68 Redux. From this day forward DSA blesses CJ with the sign of the cross (a Catholic thing) and utters go forth and multiply however beware where only legends dare tread. Last edited by Mar; 03-06-2011 at 11:52 PM. | |
| | |
| | #40 (permalink) | |
| Tempus fugit. Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Canada's National Capital |
I'm curious: is Earon Carter using standard Freak inserts or ones of his own design? Dave Loo did some customization of the DD68. Cosmetics aside, the biggest and most overlooked change he made seems similar to my mod: a milled area behind the feed port to prevent pinches, per IronChef97's post: Quote:
Last edited by CJOttawa; 03-06-2011 at 11:47 PM. | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|