| ||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|05-31-2011, 02:05 AM||#11 (permalink)|
My guns are already these colors. Either way it's a bad situation for the guys that like their guns black. However in this time and age we have had a few idiots that ruined it all for everyone.
Visit my Sponsor page:
"When all else fails, pull the pin and see what
Follow Team Blackrain on Face Book:
Best Auto cocker info ever
Just like to make crazy stuff for paintball? Click here
How Paintballs are made
|06-01-2011, 09:11 PM||#13 (permalink)|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Here's a petition I started specifically for the paintball part of this bill, sign it to help!
Online Petition Here
|06-02-2011, 02:12 AM||#14 (permalink)|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
I have emailed both of my representatives and asked them to "Oppose" this bill.
Make your voice count...
This page was developed to help amend or reject bill SB 798 which could affect the sport of paintball.
Description The California Legislative is trying to pass SB Bill 798 which calls for imitation firearms, a classification which would include paintball markers, to be brightly colored (i.e., orange) in order to distinguish them from real firearms. This is a serious concern to the paintball industry which could require all paintball markers in speedball and scenario play to be painted a bright color.
SB 798 (DE LEON) BB DEVICES: IMITATION FIREARMS - OPPOSE
STATE LEGISLATOR CONTACT INFORMATION:
1. Author of SB 798: Senator Kevin De Leon, State Capitol, Room 5108, Sacramento, CA 95814; (916) 651-4022; Fax916) 327-8817; Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
2. Senators and Assembly Members:
WEBSITE FOR ASSEMBLY MEMBER’S CONTACT INFORMATION:
Assembly Member List
WEBSITE FOR SENATOR’S CONTACT INFORMATION: Senate Member List
TO LOCATE YOUR SPECIFIC SENATOR/ASSEMBLY MEMBER:
Go to 220.127.116.11/amapsearch/framepage.asp.
The California Legislative is trying to pass SB Bill 798 which calls for imitation firearms, a classification which would include paintball markers, to be brightly colored (i.e., orange) in order to distinguish them from real firearms. This is a serious concern to the paintball industry which could require all paintball markers in speedball and scenario play to be painted a bright color.
SB 798 (DE LEON) BB DEVICES: IMITATION FIREARMS - OPPOSE
STATE LEGISLATOR CONTACT... (read more)
Mission We encourage all players in and out of California to help amend or reject this legislation by writing to Kevin De Leon, the sponsor of this bill. If you live in California, write to your senator or assembly member as well.
"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
|06-03-2011, 07:01 PM||#15 (permalink)|
I've posted this elsewhere, but will put it here too.
Tell you what. Let's look at this sentence by sentence, and define the parts in ENGLISH:
I'm using the amended version, April 13th revision:
Existing law defines "BB device" to mean any instrument that
expels a projectile, such as a BB or a pellet, through the force of
air pressure, gas pressure, or spring action, or any spot marker gun.
What will be covered: Ok, so this will cover anything that shoots using air, gas, or spring. They removed the 6mm bit. This WILL cover paintball guns, as they are a 'Spot marker gun'
Existing law defines "imitation firearm" to mean any BB device, toy
gun, replica of a firearm, or other device that is so substantially
similar in coloration and overall appearance to an existing firearm
as to lead a reasonable person to perceive that the device is a
firearm but provides that a BB device is not an imitation
firearm in regard to a provision imposing a civil fine on
the sale, manufacture, transportation, receipt, or distribution of
imitation firearms for commercial purposes
What does the law say now: an 'imitation firearm' is basically anything that looks like a gun to most people. However, there is nothing on the books about fining businesses on selling, shipping, getting, or making them.
This bill would make the provision imposing a civil fine on the
sale, manufacture, transportation, receipt, or distribution of
imitation firearms for commercial purposes applicable to BB devices.
We want to change the law so businesses can't do this. If they do, we want to make them pay.
Now for the legalese part:
SECTION 1. Section 16700 of the Penal
Code is amended to read:
We want to change the law to this:
16700. (a) As used in this part, "imitation firearm" means any BB
device, toy gun, replica of a firearm, or other device that is so
substantially similar in coloration and overall appearance to an
existing firearm as to lead a reasonable person to perceive that the
device is a firearm.
If it looks like a gun but isn't, we will call it a 'imitation firearm'
(b) As used in Section 20165, "imitation firearm" does not include
any of the following:
(1) A nonfiring collector's replica that is historically
significant, and is offered for sale in conjunction with a wall
plaque or presentation case.
No need to translate that one.
(2) A device where the entire exterior surface of the
device is white, bright red, bright orange, bright yellow, bright
green, bright blue, bright pink, or bright purple, either singly or
as the predominant color in combination with other colors in any
pattern, as provided by federal regulations governing imitation
firearms, or where the entire device is constructed of transparent or
translucent materials which permits unmistakable observation of the
device's complete contents, as provided by federal regulations
governing imitation firearms.
bright neon and/or clear imitation firearms.
So to sum this up. They want to amend the current law defining a 'imitation firearm' to include anything that shoots, looks like a gun to Joe Blow, and not let businesses make, buy, sell, or ship any 'imitation firearms', UNLESS they are bright neon and/or clear, or are a 'historically significant' replica that comes in a box or hangs on a plaque. If a commercial business breaks this law, we want to fine them a bunch of money.
I think that makes it pretty straight forward. Will this affect paintballers? YES, the SALE OF MARKERS (or shipping after upgrading) BY COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES WILL BE A FINE-ABLE OFFENSE. Same with airsoft, and BB guns. This will affect PPS and RAP4 as they are both in Cali
|06-09-2011, 01:35 PM||#16 (permalink)|
the proper use of .50cal
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Turlock, Ca
I posted lastest info the bills status in the PPS fourm. Thank you.
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline. It helps if you have some kind of football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer" Frank Zappa
|06-10-2011, 04:04 AM||#18 (permalink)|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles
It says in there that it applies to guns resembling pistols with barrels less than 16 inches of length. Should the bill be passed, could we skirt the law just by using 16+ inch barrels? Anyone know more about this?
|06-10-2011, 10:29 AM||#19 (permalink)|
|06-14-2011, 07:50 PM||#20 (permalink)|
Well we (paintballers) won, the bill now excludes paintball markers and they are now going after airsoft rifles and pistols only! I hope this bill gets defeated not because I like airsoft (i despise it but have a gas blowback to deal with the noisy crows) but so it will save lives and jobs. No on SB 798!
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|