| ||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|09-16-2008, 02:44 PM||#2 (permalink)|
Back on the ice
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Blue Jackets' HQ
Copied this from AGD's forum:
|09-16-2008, 07:33 PM||#4 (permalink)|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nor Cal
Thanks Zoo, so would the differences in the emag on offs be whether it is used in a X valve or a stainless rt pro valve?
This would be for the Stainless valve: On/Off pin:
.712" w/ brass top and double o-ring top.
And this would be for the X valve:
.725" w/ aluminum top and single o-ring top.
|09-16-2008, 07:38 PM||#5 (permalink)|
Also, some of the older valves used a single top-on/off oring in the body. Those are the retro valves, classic RT, and early emag valves. Those are non-ult compatible (FYI), and not recommended for emag use, since the emag replaces the small on/off top oring (that isnt in those other valves) with the quad oring.
If you are building an emag, and looking for performance, trim the pin down to .700.
Sometimes it's good to be Evil.
BigEvil's MCB Feedback
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|