|The Dead Zone Paintball Related Chat|
| ||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|03-17-2013, 03:05 PM||#41 (permalink)|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lawrence, KS
I'm not sure why this thread became about ramping vs. semi and how this affects paint sales, the OP's argument is that the ROF cap doesn't apply to mechs, so an electro in semi would be subject to the same cap as one in PSP ramping.
The point, as before, is that having specific limitations is meant to de-emphasize "advantages" and "disadvantages" that are attributable to the operating parameters of the equipment. If there really were some sort of advantage to be gained by using this supposed loophole in the rules, then somebody would be doing it. The fact that they're not makes the answer self-evident: it's not an advantage.
"Arrogance on the part of the meritorious is even more offensive to us than the arrogance of those without merit: for merit itself is offensive."
"To love is to protect. To protect is to never betray."
|03-17-2013, 05:01 PM||#42 (permalink)|
Join Date: Jan 2011
I don't see any rule that prohibits a second trigger. Perhaps a dual trigger pneumatic with the second trigger on a fore-grip. You'd have mech's outshooting electros for a season or however long it took the PSP to outlaw that exploit.
|03-17-2013, 08:51 PM||#44 (permalink)|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Plattsburgh, NY
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|