Photography Grab your camera and video equipment and head on inside!

Thread Tools
Old 04-17-2013, 02:56 PM   #11 (permalink)
Legal Eagle
Falcon16's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: St. Catharines Ontario Canada
Send a message via MSN to Falcon16 Send a message via Skype™ to Falcon16

Brass and Wood Fan
CF for professional cameras will never die. They are more stable and in terms of performance stomp even the fastest sd card into the ground

Feedback +38/-0
Click here to email me
My youtube channel
Click here to pay me via Paypal

Originally Posted by ApoC_101 View Post
Pump paintball is cheaper than any drug habit I've ever heard of.
Falcon16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 03:32 PM   #12 (permalink)
I see dead people
chopper duke's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Metro ATL

My D300 has a single CF slot but I use a SD/ CF Converter and have never had a buffer issue with it but it's only 12.3MP. My D800 has dual slots, one SD and one CF. I have experienced buffer issues when shooting bracketed but it's a 36MP camera so the files are quite a bit larger. It's not as bad with a CF card.

However, you have to weigh the need for higher write speeds vs the cost of media. I'd personally prefer to have 2 32GB SD cards that write slower than a single 32GB CF card that writes faster.
chopper duke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 04:13 PM   #13 (permalink)
Memento mori.
Finnigan's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NJ. Exit 77

Brass and Wood Fan
Kilt Club
So much more to think about now that cameras are digital. My old olympus OM-G seems VERY simple by comparison.

I'll look into the rent thing. Thanks!
Finnigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 04:20 PM   #14 (permalink)
Memento mori.
Finnigan's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NJ. Exit 77

Brass and Wood Fan
Kilt Club
by chance did you rent this? LOL
More Cowbell - Take your photography or videography to the next level with more cowbell
Finnigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 09:50 PM   #15 (permalink)
Traded guns for cameras
Frink's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary AB Canada

Brass and Wood Fan
Originally Posted by wrongbloke View Post

Also Sony apparently uses an electronic veiwfinder in the alpha, horrible choice on their part, makes manual focusing less precise.
Actually, the new SLT's with the electronic viewfinder make manual focusing a breeze.

Current SLR's can't see DOF in the viewfinder below 2.8. So if you're shooting a 1.4 manual focus prime wide open, you're seeing the DOF @ 2.8 and critical focus is impossible without using the focus confirmation dot.

With an EVF, you're seeing exactly what the lens sees.

OP, bottom line is all of the suggested camera's are good, and you'll get similar performance from all of them.

Sounds like your wife will be fine with a body and kit lens to start, and all of the companies (Nikon, Canon, Sony, Pentax) have good offerings. All of those companies also have very similar entry level glass (telephoto and cheap primes), so don't worry about that either.

Nikon and Canon both have great lens lineups, but Sony has some awesome Carl Zeiss glass and Pentax makes amazing prime lenses.
Originally Posted by RepomanGene View Post
****ing Ninja my ***...that **** is Black
Frink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 09:54 PM   #16 (permalink)
Confirmed Agglet
tomdabmb's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, Mass.

I love my d3100. I use my 50mm 1.8 religiously.


Originally Posted by Mayvik View Post
I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
tomdabmb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2013, 11:24 PM   #17 (permalink)
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: chicago, il

Originally Posted by Finnigan View Post

I went through a number of cNet reviews and one complaint that seemed to come up with Alpha's is image color quality when using presets (like portrait, landscape, etc.) maybe this would push her to learn manual settings though.

Any thoughts, recommendations or feedback you could provide would be appreciated.
My old roommate had one, no better or worse then any entry level Nikon or Canon.

With any dslr the scene modes are always going to be crappy, I always laugh when I see people using these or full auto settings because the pictures they take will be far worse then a decent point and shoot. Same goes with any kind of pop up flash on some dslr's.

The number one deciding factor imo for brand is to choose the brand your other photographer friends use. That way you can borrow their glass

Another thing I always recommend for anyone starting out is to buy a 50mm prime lens and body seperate instead of with the kit zoom lens. She will need to learn the basics of arperture control and the few extra stops on a prime lens will come in handy until she can invest in an off camera flash setup. As any photography person will tell you its not the body its the glass. That prime lens will take better pics then a kit lens on a thousand dollar dslr.
boo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 12:02 AM   #18 (permalink)
To the Space Olympics!
aaronlecain's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Belmont NH

I have a Sony A77 and my wife has a Sony A390. We love them. The A77 has the EVF and it is wonderful. There are more lenses in Nikon and Canon but who has the money for them all? Sony's line of lenses are good and sigma, tamron, Carl Zeiss and many other lens manufacturers make the Alpha mount lenses. I like the control layout on the sony cameras. There is a lot of reference to Sony's other products (DVD players for example) but Nikon makes scanners, microscopes, and sport optics, Canon makes printers, medical equipment, copiers, and other things. I have had a crappy Canon printer but that in itself is not enough for me to run from their cameras.

It all comes down to personal preference. What do you or she like. I like my Sony products, but I have owned a canon rebel and printer, nikon riflescopes, and a crappy sony DVD player.
About as subtle as a flying brick

aaronlecain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 09:14 PM   #19 (permalink)
Seasoned Member
esseprometheus's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WI

I have to agree with aaronlecain above me, I switched out of Canon to an A77 and the EVF is fantastic. I honestly can't imagine going back to an optical viewfinder. The EVF displays exactly what your camera 'sees' so that the image you take is the one you see. Also having every bit of information including a histogram in the viewfinder is mighty convenient.
qui non para bellum, nisi nis, homo trans mor
esseprometheus Feedback
esseprometheus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply » General » Off-Topic » Photography

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO
© MCB Network LLC