mcarterbrown.com

mcarterbrown.com (http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/)
-   MCB Reviews It (http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/mcb-reviews/)
-   -   Milsig Paradigm Pro Video Review (http://www.mcarterbrown.com/forums/mcb-reviews/215886-milsig-paradigm-pro-video-review.html)

russc 10-12-2012 01:44 PM

Milsig Paradigm Pro Video Review
 
Just finished editing this up. Good to see more and more mag fed manufacturers...I hope I can get my hands on some of them!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk5RQ4yxy40

Shooting video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCcGNF3lf5M

Gameplay:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmPM3vtFSpY

InBlack 10-12-2012 04:05 PM

sweetness, great job!

idkfa 10-12-2012 05:54 PM

Looks great.

However, I do wish that they would sacrifice some of the MILSIM styling to provide a more suitable platform for paintball. I have never found inline stocks useful, I'd much rather see something off the bottom of the grip frame.

russc 10-12-2012 06:40 PM

I think the CQB model actually comes with bottomline out of the box? It's also got the rails cut down to 4 inches or so, and I think they're removable.

Reloadro 10-13-2012 04:40 PM

nice review!

InBlack 10-14-2012 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by idkfa (Post 2502710)
Looks great.

However, I do wish that they would sacrifice some of the MILSIM styling to provide a more suitable platform for paintball. I have never found inline stocks useful, I'd much rather see something off the bottom of the grip frame.

I'm sorry, but you are crazy, lol.
As far as MILSIM paintball goes, an inline tank-in-stock is king.

idkfa 10-14-2012 05:46 PM

Yes, as far as MILSIM paintball goes, you are right. But as I stated, I want to sacrifice at least some of the MILSIM aspect to give you a gun without an inline stock. Give people the option of running tank off the bottom of the grip frame.

There are people that want magfed guns but who have absolutely no interest in MILSIM and the accoutrements, either beneficial or not, that come with it.

mikeds80 10-15-2012 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by idkfa (Post 2504310)
Yes, as far as MILSIM paintball goes, you are right. But as I stated, I want to sacrifice at least some of the MILSIM aspect to give you a gun without an inline stock. Give people the option of running tank off the bottom of the grip frame.

There are people that want magfed guns but who have absolutely no interest in MILSIM and the accoutrements, either beneficial or not, that come with it.

The CQB paradigm looks like something more along these lines. It's built into the older blowback bodies but retains the new valve system. Since it's "CQB" they took all the extra stuff off and gave it a bottom line. Aside from the top rail and the short barrel shroud it looks like a fairly neutral gun. I think they're also only $250. The only downside is it can't use the newer square head mags, which are supposed to be improved.

Edit: Actually I'm not sure if it comes with a bottom line. The old ones did, the new one looks like it has a back bottle asa, hopefully it can be switched.

DSA 10-15-2012 06:27 PM

Man this looks like a damn fun little gun to own.

Shroker 10-16-2012 05:29 PM

It is very fun to play with.

In regards to the tank on the bottom. You could use a stock with a inline air through the buffer tube and then use a remote coil to air tank on your back. That has seem to be the more preferable choice for weight balance sake.

I have to do a shot consistency sometime but at best can only do dry fire ones at the moment.

The K-Series CQB Mk III still has the middle ASA gap which lets people do the bottom air tank setup.

@mikedsd80: There is no CQB Paradigm. :P. The Paradigm Pro as is , is set to sell as a sniper platform. There are a few people so far that have dropped the long range and barrel and put on shorty rails (Or for those previous Paradigm 1 owners or those who have Paradigm 1 shrouds) have used that instead.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.n...20925574_o.jpg

The Paradigm Pro uses the in-line regulator to do velocity adjustements as opposed to the older style which was; to be blunt, restricted the air with an object in the path.

The first generation power tubes had issues with that one and the second generation power tubes alleviated a bit but still is not as efficient.

The in-line regulator regulates the pressure from between 200-350 PSI with a blowout valve set to 400 PSI.

in regards to the teflon o-ring. The o-ring is compressed under a fitting that connects the air hose that would go along the side of the gun on the previous markers. For a lot of people, when taking the marker apart or over time through roughing; the fitting might loosen and causes gaps to form inbetween the fitting and the teflon o-ring.

The HEAT core completely eliminates this issue since the HEAT core regulates the air and passes it through directly from the back.

The weight reduction seems to come from the way it is milled internally. Material seems to be the same but I could be wrong. It is aluminum and that is as far as I can remember ha.

Hope that clears up some of my stuttering during the video which was a bit nervous inducing haha.

I have had absolute pleasure shooting this marker and I look forward to the near future of very little problems and the future road for MILSIG and what other companies will bring to the table.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO
© MCB Network LLC